Self-publishing and the stigma within.
APK | March 10, 2010 | 6:57 pmMy friend Nick linked to a post at the Self-Publishing Review today titled The Real Source of Self-Publishing Stigma. I read it and just have to reply.
I need to go through this point by point. Let’s start at the top. The first thing considered is “Mainstream Publishers/Agents”
They don’t really care whether you self-publish or not. I mean think about this for a moment. If you’re self-publishing, you’re one less manuscript in their slush pile. If you fail, they don’t have to deal with you. If you succeed, then you are a proven quantity to them… a sure thing, which is something publishers like.
Well, yes and no. The thing is that when you list self-published books and then try to get an agent or a publisher they do see it and count it against you. Why? Because it shows that you couldn’t find anyone else on Earth to take a chance on your work. Keep that in mind.
Agents DO discourage self-publishing very often on their blogs and such, but the stigma doesn’t really flow from them. More about that in a minute… [I am skipping down to the "more in a minute part as the rest of this quote] I find it insane that while many in traditional publishing will pontificate about how indie authors aren’t “vetted,” GUESS WHAT? Agents aren’t vetted. Anyone can call themselves an agent and a bad agent is worse than no agent at all. Most top agents aren’t taking on new clients because they don’t have to. They’ve got enough good authors making them plenty of money.
I agree! Agents aren’t vetted, except if you count seeing who their clients are and doing leg-work and vetting them yourself. Which the agent will do with you, as well. No there is no One True Source for it, but there are general rules and guidelines and many lists on-line of bad lit. agents. So… yeah if you do no work there is no master list. So do the damn work yourself.
Read the rest of this entry »
